Now here is a term that has caused much chaos in the world ever since the industrial revolution with its attendant path to riches and emergence of the new and conscious middle class. The sudden migration to cities was so chaotic and the ghetto like living conditions so alarming that intelligentsia but had to rethink capitalism. Thus was born the idea of socialism which aimed above all for “equality”. However theory being what it is, in practice most of the socialist, communist and other variants of these revolutions did not work as eventually man is guided by personal motives and not sacrificial societal values. But quest for equality remains important.
While an equal society is perhaps impossible but greater equality has been achieved by some nations. Interestingly these are not the left leaning ones but countries that have managed to balance economic development with social objectives. Here I highlight some of these. There are also some dirt poor nations that have good degree of equality but it really means people are equally poor – or there is no wealth to be exploited. But there are several already developed as well as fast developing nations that top this list (no not the BRICS).
Gini coefficient is a measure of Inequality where Zero represents perfect equality and 100 perfect inequality. So lower the score, better you are. Just to set a benchmark, the world average is 39, so really below that obviously is good and higher than that not so good. Some highlights:
As usual,
on all things wholesome and good, Denmark always catches the top spot. It is
not just environment protection, wind energy sort of things they have a lead
on, they have the greatest equality in the world. Most Scandinavian nations are
close behind.
Eastern Europe has remarkably good score on equality (those are the ones I referred to as the fast emerging ones) but do not attribute it to their communist past in haste because their original mother Soviet is far behind on this.
Several of the small, developed and homogeneous European countries do well. I have often heard that when people relate to each other, they do not mind contributing to social welfare programs etc. and class cohesion is greater.
Eastern Europe has remarkably good score on equality (those are the ones I referred to as the fast emerging ones) but do not attribute it to their communist past in haste because their original mother Soviet is far behind on this.
Several of the small, developed and homogeneous European countries do well. I have often heard that when people relate to each other, they do not mind contributing to social welfare programs etc. and class cohesion is greater.
Now here is
the good news, Afghanistan makes it to the top 10 – that is really good. (I
once heard a joke that when you say you are among the top 10 it often means you
are the tenth..
…well is the case here)
…well is the case here)
And that is
not the only surprise entry. Ethiopia has the best score in all of Africa and
rank 15 at that. Kudos!
However the
news is not so good for the better off African nations which seem to be at the
bottom which means the development wealth has been cornered by a few.
A little
better than that are most of the left leaning Latin American countries which
does not surprise me. Socialism does not lead to equality, it just leads to
economic instability and corruption. Now there may be some oddball nation that
defies that but overall, this has been the history thus far.
But this is
not to say that market or state driven capitalism automatically leads to equal
societies either as the two largest economies – the US and China have scores
above 45 – well above the world average.
I guess there is no magic formula to achieve equality as the list seems to have a lot of variety. But I think somewhere homogeneity, transparency, accessible education and market economy tend to play a larger hand.
I guess there is no magic formula to achieve equality as the list seems to have a lot of variety. But I think somewhere homogeneity, transparency, accessible education and market economy tend to play a larger hand.
It is not
clear to me whether equality leads to greater social cohesion or it is a result
of it (the chicken and egg story). But nevertheless, alongside development,
equality is a good aim to work on. It would be easier being poor when everyone
around you is also so. I guess it would be much harder and dispiriting when you
are poor in a rich country as also the cost of living is higher. So nations higher up on the development path
would do well to focus on that objective.
Gini Coefficient - basis World Bank data
(Only the World average has been flicked from the CIA data)
I have color coded them also - Green is V good, Orange - Good, Blue - Not so good, Red - Oh well, you are in the "red"
|
24
|
|
Sweden
|
25
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
Austria
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
Slovakia
|
26
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Belarus
|
26.5
|
|
26.9
|
||
27.8
|
||
27.8
|
||
28.2
|
||
28.3
|
||
29
|
||
29.8
|
||
30
|
||
Pakistan
|
30
|
|
30
|
||
30.5
|
||
30.8
|
||
30.8
|
||
30.8
|
||
30.9
|
||
30.9
|
||
30.9
|
||
31.2
|
||
31.2
|
||
31.3
|
||
31.9
|
||
32.1
|
||
32.6
|
||
32.7
|
||
32.8
|
||
33
|
||
33
|
||
33
|
||
33.3
|
||
33.4
|
||
33.7
|
||
33.7
|
||
33.7
|
||
34
|
||
34
|
||
34.1
|
||
34.3
|
||
34.3
|
||
34.4
|
||
34.5
|
||
34.6
|
||
34.7
|
||
35.3
|
||
35.3
|
||
35.4
|
||
35.5
|
||
35.5
|
||
35.6
|
||
35.8
|
||
36
|
||
36
|
||
36.2
|
||
36.2
|
||
36.2
|
||
36.5
|
||
36.6
|
||
36.7
|
||
36.7
|
||
37.4
|
||
37.6
|
||
37.6
|
||
37.7
|
||
37.9
|
||
38.1
|
||
38.1
|
||
38.2
|
||
38.3
|
||
38.5
|
||
38.6
|
||
38.9
|
||
39
|
||
39
|
||
|
39
|
|
39.2
|
||
39.2
|
||
39.4
|
||
39.8
|
||
39.8
|
||
40
|
||
40
|
||
40.1
|
||
40.3
|
||
40.3
|
||
40.5
|
||
40.5
|
||
40.8
|
||
40.9
|
||
41.1
|
||
41.3
|
||
41.4
|
||
41.5
|
||
41.5
|
||
42.5
|
||
42.6
|
||
42.8
|
||
42.8
|
||
43
|
||
43.2
|
||
44.1
|
||
44.3
|
||
|
44.4
|
|
44.5
|
||
44.5
|
||
44.8
|
||
45
|
||
45.3
|
||
45.5
|
||
45.5
|
||
45.7
|
||
46.2
|
||
47
|
||
47
|
||
47.2
|
||
47.3
|
||
47.3
|
||
47.7
|
||
48.1
|
||
48.1
|
||
48.3
|
||
48.8
|
||
49.3
|
||
50.1
|
||
50.5
|
||
50.7
|
||
50.8
|
||
50.8
|
||
50.9
|
||
51.5
|
||
51.9
|
||
52.1
|
||
52.4
|
||
52.5
|
||
52.9
|
||
53.1
|
||
53.3
|
||
54.6
|
||
54.7
|
||
55.9
|
||
55.9
|
||
56.3
|
||
56.3
|
||
57
|
||
58.6
|
||
59.2
|
||
61
|
||
63.1
|
||
63.9
|
||
64.3
|
||
65.8
|
No comments:
Post a Comment